APR 2026
When Does an Evidence-Based Supplement Outgrow Its Purpose?
From My Clinic Notebook
Last week I found myself in a physician workroom between patients when the conversation unexpectedly shifted to creatine. Within a few minutes, the room had split into two camps — one viewing it as one of the most thoroughly studied, underutilized supplements in medicine; the other questioning whether the enthusiasm had begun to outpace the science.
For athletic performance, I don’t think the debate is particularly controversial anymore. What interested me was what came next: could creatine support recovery after concussion? Preserve muscle during perimenopause? Influence cognition? Those are very different questions than we were asking a decade ago.
Driving home that evening, I realized I wasn’t asking whether creatine works. I was asking something more interesting — when does an evidence-based supplement outgrow its original purpose?
What We Know
Not just what the literature says — how confident we should be that it changes clinical practice.
After a concussion the brain faces an acute metabolic challenge — energy demand rises while ATP production may be impaired. As an energy buffer through the phosphocreatine system, creatine could in theory support this period. The biology is compelling and early research encouraging, but high-quality human trials remain limited. This is exactly the type of research worth following closely.
It’s increasingly marketed for weight loss, but that framing overreaches. What creatine may do is improve training capacity, support recovery, and help preserve lean muscle. Train more consistently and hold more lean mass, and better body composition may follow — a very different claim than creatine itself causing weight loss. Sometimes the headlines move faster than the science.
Question to Consider
How much evidence is enough before an emerging therapy becomes part of routine clinical practice — and how do we balance curiosity with healthy skepticism along the way?
Medicine is constantly evolving. So are the questions worth asking. I’ll keep sharing what I’m learning — from research, from colleagues, and from the patients who continually remind me that good medicine begins with curiosity. If this perspective resonates with you, I’d be honored to have you join me for the next edition.